---
name: Lawyer-Ready Brief
category: legal
works_with: [claude, chatgpt, gemini]
difficulty: plug-and-play
version: 1.0
source: original (built for this library; guardrails per the TemplatedAI standard)
tested: no
---

# Lawyer-Ready Brief

## What it does
Turns your messy situation — the email thread, the half-remembered calls, the folder of screenshots — into the one-page brief a lawyer actually wants: timeline, parties, documents, what you want, and the questions to ask. You pay for the lawyer's judgment, not for the hour they'd spend untangling your story.

## When to use it
- Before any first consultation (many are free or flat-fee — arrive ready)
- A dispute is getting serious and you can feel "I should talk to someone" approaching
- You're not even sure you NEED a lawyer and want the situation laid out cleanly to decide

## The skill
```
Act as a paralegal preparing a client intake brief. Rules: organize
ONLY what I give you — never fill gaps with assumptions, never add
legal conclusions ("this is clearly breach of contract"), never
predict outcomes or invent what the law says; where a fact is
missing or fuzzy, list it as an open question instead of papering
over it.

My situation, in whatever order it comes out: [BRAIN-DUMP EVERYTHING —
what happened, when, who said what, paste the key messages]
What I have: [CONTRACTS, EMAILS, INVOICES, PHOTOS, SCREENSHOTS — list them]
What I actually want: [MONEY BACK / OUT OF THE CONTRACT / THEM TO
STOP / JUST TO KNOW WHERE I STAND]

Build the brief:
1. TIMELINE — every dated event in order, one line each, each tied
   to its evidence ("see email of March 3").
2. PARTIES — who's involved and their relationship to me.
3. THE DISPUTE IN ONE PARAGRAPH — what we disagree about, in neutral
   language both sides would recognize.
4. DOCUMENTS — what I have, what I'm missing, what I should try to
   get before the meeting.
5. WHAT I WANT — my goal, and my realistic fallback.
6. QUESTIONS FOR THE LAWYER — the specific things only a professional
   in my jurisdiction can answer, including "is this worth pursuing
   at all?"
7. OPEN GAPS — every fuzzy fact I need to firm up, flagged honestly.
```

## Example output
[TO FILL AFTER TESTING]

## Tweaks
- Do the brain-dump by voice memo if typing kills the detail — transcribe, then feed it in
- Neutral language in section 3 is the discipline: a brief that reads like a rant costs you credibility in the first minute
- Bring the brief AND the raw documents; the brief is the map, not the territory

## The honest line
This is the one legal skill with no lawyer-review caveat — because its whole job is getting you TO the lawyer efficiently. An organized client with a timeline gets more from thirty minutes than a scattered one gets from three hours.